Association between bacterial resistance profile and the development of intra-abdominal abscesses in pediatric patients with perforated appendicitis: cohort study.

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to determine the association between the presence of a microorganism resistant to the antibiotic used in empirical therapy and the development of intra-abdominal abscesses in children with perforated appendicitis. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was conducted in patients under 18 years of age who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy between November 1, 2019, and September 30, 2020, in whom perforated appendicitis was documented intraoperatively. Peritoneal fluid samples were taken for bacteria culture purposes, and clinical and microbiological data were collected from all patients. RESULTS: A total of 232 patients were included in the study. The most isolated microorganisms were Escherichia coli (80.14%) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (7.45%). In addition, 5.31% of E. coli isolates were classified as ESBL-producing organisms. No association was found between a germ resistant to empiric antimicrobial therapy and the development of a postoperative intra-abdominal abscess. Multivariate analysis showed that being a high-risk patient on admission (OR 2.89 (p = 0.01)) was associated with the development of intra-abdominal abscesses postoperatively. CONCLUSION: E. coli was the most commonly isolated microorganism, with a low rate of ESBL-producing isolates. No association between resistance and risk of postoperative intra-abdominal abscess was found. However, it was identified that being a high-risk patient on admission was associated with this complication. TYPE OF STUDY: Prognosis study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I.

Improving Incident Reporting in a Hospital-Based Radiation Oncology Department: The Impact of a Customized Crew Resource Training and Event Reporting Intervention.

Background Radiation oncology (RO) is a high-risk environment with an increased potential for error due to the complex automated and manual interactions between heterogeneous teams and advanced technologies. Errors involving procedural deviations-- can adversely impact patient morbidity and mortality. Under-reporting of errors is common in healthcare for reasons such as fear of retribution, liability, embarrassment, etc. Incident reporting is a proven tool for learning from errors and, when effectively implemented, can improve quality and safety. Crew resource management (CRM) employs just culture principles with a team-based safety system. The pillars of CRM include mandatory error reporting and structured training to proactively identify, learn from, and mitigate incidents. High-reliability organizations, such as commercial aviation, have achieved exemplary safety performance since adopting CRM strategies. Objective Our aim was to double the rate of staff error reporting from baseline rates utilizing CRM strategies during a six-month study period in a hospital-based radiation oncology (RO) department. Methods This quasi-experimental study involved a retrospective review of reported radiation oncology incidents between January 2015 and March 2016, which helped inform the development and implementation of a two-step custom CRM training and incident learning system (ILS) intervention in May 2016. A convenience sample of approximately 50 RO staff (Staff) performing over 100 external beam and daily brachytherapy treatments participated in weekly training for six months while continuing to report errors on a hospital-enterprise system. A discipline-specific incident learning system (ILS) customized for the department was added during the last three months of the study, enabling staff to identify, characterize, and report incidents and potential errors. Weekly process control charts used to trend incident reporting rates (total number of reported incidents in a given month /1000 fractions), and custom reports characterizing the potential severity as well as the location of incidents along the treatment path, were reviewed, analyzed, and addressed by an RO multidisciplinary project committee established for this study. Results A five-fold increase in the monthly reported number of incidents (n = 9.3) was observed during the six-month intervention period as compared to the 16-month pre-intervention period (n = 1.8). A significant increase (>3 sigma) was observed when the custom reporting system was added during the last three study months. Conclusion A discipline-specific electronic ILS enabling the characterization of individual RO incidents combined with routine CRM training is an effective method for increasing staff incident reporting and engagement, leading to a more systematic, team-based mitigation process. These combined strategies allowed for real-time reporting, analysis, and learning that can be used to enhance patient safety, improve teamwork, streamline communication, and advance a culture of safety.

Submaxilitis aguda en paciente con enfermedad de Crohn en tratamiento con infliximab / Acute submandibular sialadenitis in a patient with Crohn's disease being treated with infliximab

No disponible

Indicación de los pulsos de glucocorticoides en pacientes con infección por SARS-CoV-2 / Indication of glucocorticoid pulses for patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection

No disponible

Correction to: Surgical Morbidity in the Elderly Bariatric Patient: Does Age Matter?

Due to a metadata tagging error the name of author Andrés Esteban San Martín was indexed incorrectly. The author's given name is Andrés Esteban and his family name is San Martín.

Surgical Morbidity in the Elderly Bariatric Patient: Does Age Matter?

BACKGROUND: Obesity is a global health problem that also affects older adults. In Chile, as in most of the developing countries, more than half of older adults are overweight or obese, and bariatric surgery may be riskier for this group. The aim of this study is to compare our experience in patients over 60 years of age with a control group to determine associated surgical morbidity and mortality. METHODS: Case-control study of bariatric surgeries performed between 2006 and 2017 in our institution. Patients aged ≥ 60 years for the case group versus control group for patients ≤ 50 years selected randomly, matched by body mass index, type 2 diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, surgical technique, and gender (ratio 1:2). Primary endpoint was surgical morbidity, 30-day readmission, and mortality. RESULTS: Seventy-two patients in case group were matched with 144 patients in control group. Surgical complications rate was the same for both groups. No differences were observed in the conversion to open surgery rate or 30-day readmission rate. There was no mortality in this series. CONCLUSION: In this case-control study, being elderly does not increase the risk of morbidity and mortality associated with bariatric surgery.

[Prognostic factors in oropharyngeal cancer]. / Factores pronóstico en cáncer de orofaringe.

INTRODUCTION: Oropharyngeal carcinoma (OFC) is rare in Mexico, it only represents 0.6% of all carcinomas. Treatment alternatives are radiotherapy (RT) or radiotherapy-surgery association and prognosis depends on stage and tumor location. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to know prognostic factors in patients with OFC treated with RT. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with OFC. Analyzed variables were tumor location, RT technique (with or without field reduction; TRC and TSRC), tumor stage, histologic grade, and macroscopic tumor type. Survival was estimated with Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: A total of 70 patients, median age of 62 years, 19 women and 51 men. Locations included 24 tonsil, 35 tongue base, eight soft palate, and three posterior lateral wall. A total of 32 tumors were excrescent and 38, ulcer infiltrating, 81% T3-T4 and 18% T1-T2. RT median dose was 5,625 rads; 51 were treated with TSRC and 19 with TRC. Local-regional control was achieved in 35 patients (50%), mortality secondary to treatment was 12.9% whit there were 5-year overall survival. Loco-regional recurrence was 44%. Most frequent morbility for treatment was dysphagia (66%). Variables with statistical survival significance were TRC (18% vs. 53% p = 0.0012), stage (T1-2 vs. T3-4; 58% vs. 21% p = 0.0025, and tonsil location (43% vs. 24% p < 0.005). OFC diagnosis is usually made in advanced stages. Survival prognostic factors are tumor location, tumor stage, and RT technique.